“Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring

Research Article
How to Cite
Safronov V.V. “Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring. Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites). 2025. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 119-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2025.12.1.4 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article examines the political activity of Russian citizens in conventional — legal and legitimate — forms, its prevalence in comparison with other post-communist countries and Western European democracies as well as the social structuring of such activity. Research points to the passivity of civil society in Russia, which is assumed to be due to the communist political culture and the actions of the authorities aimed at controlling and restricting mass political activity. The data from the European Social Survey (ESS) on the eight main conventional forms of political activity, obtained in 2006–2018 surveys in post-communist countries — Russia, Hungary and Poland, as well as in Western European democracies, including Germany, France and Sweden, were considered. The results confirm that in Russian society, as in other post-communist countries, a small minority participates in politics, whereas in Western democracies political activism encompasses much broader social circles. There are distinct social inequalities in political participation in our country. It is closely related to social demography (it increases with higher education and decreases with age), increases under favorable conditions of mobilization (connections with other people and organizations) and political predisposition (interest in politics, internal political efficacy, party identification). The revealed facts reinforce considerations about the political passivity of Russian citizens, reflecting cultural beliefs rooted in the Soviet era.
Keywords:
political participation in Russia, conventional activism, trends 2006–2018, social structuring, comparison with post-communist and Western democracies, European Social Survey (ESS)

Author Biography

Vyacheslav V. Safronov, Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia
senior research fellow, Department of Sociology of Power and Civil Society

References

1. Arkhipova A.S., Zakharov A.V., Kozlova I.V. The ethnography of protest: who participated — and why — in the rallies of 2021. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2021. No. 5. P. 289–323. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.2032 (In Russ.)

2. VCIOM. Social and Political Activity of Russians: Monitoring. 2021, August 2. Accessed 28.02.2025. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/socialnaja-i-politicheskaja-aktivnost-rossijan-monitoring (In Russ.)

3. VCIOM. Protest Potential. 2025. Accessed 07.03.2025. URL: https://wciom.ru/ratings/protestnyi-potencial. (In Russ.)

4. Guseva P.D. Demonstrations as a form of non-institutionalised political participation: the relationship with institutional trust and political regime risks (based on data from the European Social Survey, 2020–2022). Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2024. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 54–78. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2024.30.4.3 (In Russ.)

5. Dombrovskaya A.Yu., Sinyakov A.V. Opposition potential of Russians’ civil participation: results of the cluster analysis. Political science. 2021. No. 3. P. 142–160. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.03.06 (In Russ.)

6. Zvonovsky V.B., Solovyova Y.V., Khodykin A.V., Asimova A.M., Kozhevnikova A.A., Akimova E.S., Elovikova A.A. Political mobilization of the Russian opposition on the example of protests in January 2021. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2021. No. 6. P. 386–409. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2011 (In Russ.)

7. Levada-Center. Political Consciousness. 2019, July 15. Accessed 04.03.2025. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/07/15/politicheskoe-sozna/ (In Russ.)

8. Levada-Center. Political Participation and Relations with the State in Russia. 2021, March 16. Accessed 07.04.2025. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2021/03/16/politicheskoe-uchastie-v-otnosheniya-s-gosudarstvom-v-rossii (In Russ.)

9. Levada-Center. Willingness to Participate in Politics. 2023, June 21. Accessed 04.03.2025. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2016/08/23/gotovnost-uchastvovat-v-politike/ (In Russ.)

10. Levada-Center. Protest Potential and Attitude of Russians towards Anti-War Protests in December 2024. 2025, January 16. Accessed 07.03.2025. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2025/01/16/protestnyj-potentsial-i-otnoshenie-rossiyan-k-antivoennym-vystupleniyam-v-dekabre-2024-goda/?ysclid=meqckqq214901510368 (In Russ.)

11. Miryasova O.A. Potential, repertoire, and factors of mass political activism in Russia. Political science. 2014. No. 4. P. 162–185. (In Russ.)

12. Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. Civic participation: features of discourse and actual trends of development. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2017. No. 6. P. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.04 (In Russ.)

13. Parma R.V. Public activism of Russian citizens in offline and online spaces. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2021. No. 6. P. 145–170. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2042 (In Russ.)

14. Patrushev S.V., Aivazova S.G., Kertman G.L., Kuchinov A.M., Miryasova O.A., Nedyak I.L., Pavlova T.V., Panov L.G., Filippova L.E. Institutional analysis of the political space in Russia: preliminary research results. Rossija reformirujushhajasja. Ezhegodnik: Vyp. 17 [Russia reforming. Yearbook: Issue 17.] Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow: New Chronograph, 2019. P. 527–571. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2019.22 (In Russ.)

15. Patrushev S.V., Kuchinov A.M., Miryasova O.A., Nedyak I.L., Pavlova T.V., Filippova L.E. Formation of civil responsibility in Russia: the institutional context. Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 27–47. https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.1.7093 (In Russ.)

16. Patrushev S.V., Zhavoronkov A.V., Miryasova O.A., Nedyak I.L., Pavlova T.V., Filippova L.E. Transformation of political, social and civil under domination: Russian case. Rossija reformirujushhajasja. Ezhegodnik: Vyp. 19 [Russia reforming. Yearbook: Issue 19.] Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow: Novy Chronograf, 2021. P. 133–174. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2021.6 (In Russ.)

17. Patrushev S.V., Zhavoronkov A.V., Miryasova O.A., Nedyak I.L., Ostrovskaya Yu.E., Pavlova T.V., Pritvorova D.E., Filippova L.E. Social actors and the constitution of political space in Russia: towards the analysis of strategies for change. Rossija reformirujushhajasja. Ezhegodnik: Vyp. 19 [Russia reforming. Yearbook: Issue 20 [Russia reforming. Yearbook: Issue 20.] Ed. by M.K. Gorshkov. Moscow: Novy Chronograf, 2022. P. 229–264. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2022.9 (In Russ.)

18. Patrushev S.V., Filippova L.E. Mass politics: the experience of institutional reconceptualization. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2016. No. 2. P. 131–151. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.10 (In Russ.)

19. Petukhov V.V. Civic participation in the context of Russia’s political modernization. Socis. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2012. No. 1. P.–48–60. (In Russ.)

20. Petukhov V.V. Civic participation in Russia today: interaction of social and political practices. Socis. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2019. No. 12. P. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250007743-0. (In Russ.)

21. Petukhov V.V. The generation of the «2000s»: ideological orientations and political participation. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2012. No. 4. P. 56–62. (In Russ.)

22. Petukhov V.V., Petukhov R.V. Participatory democracy: institutional crisis and new prospects. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2015. No. 5. P. 25–48. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.04 (In Russ.)

23. Petukhov R.V. Local communities and civil activism. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2014. No. 4. P. 60–71. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2014.4.05 (In Russ.)

24. Safronov V.V. Contextual moderations of electoral educational inequalities in European countries. Power and elites. 2024. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 40–70. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2024.11.1.2 (In Russ.)

25. Safronov V.V. Corruption and class inequalities in electoral participation in European countries. Power and elites. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 5–42. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2023.10.1.1 (In Russ.)

26. Safronov V.V. Political participation in European countries: social context and socio-cultural inequalities. Teleskop: zhurnal sociologicheskih i marketingovyh issledovanij. 2015. No. 1. P. 26–37. (In Russ.)

27. Safronov V.V. Social structuring of participation in the 2021 State duma elections. Power and elites. 2024. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 53–73. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2024.11.2.3 (In Russ.)

28. Safronov V.V. Participation in the State duma elections: social inequalities, motivations and mobilization. Power and elites. 2023. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 121–169. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2023.10.2.6 (In Russ.)

29. Sedova N.N. Civic activism in modern Russia: forms, factors, and social base. Sotsiologicheskiy zurnal = sociological journal. 2014. No. 2. P. 48–71. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2014.2.495 (In Russ.)

30. Balch G.I. Multiple indicators in survey research: the concept “sense of political efficacy”. Political methodology. 1974. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 1–43.

31. Barnes S.H., Kaase M. et al. Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979. 607 p.

32. Blais A. Turnout in elections. The Oxford handbook of political behavior. Ed. by R.J. Dalton, H.‐D. Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0033.

33. Blais A., Daoust J.-F. The motivation to vote: explaining electoral participation. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020. 156 p. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774862691.

34. Campbell A., Converse P.E., Miller W.E., Stokes D.E. The American voter. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980 [1960]. 576 p.

35. Campbell A., Gurin G., Miller W.E. The voter decides. New York: Row, Peterson, and Co, 1954. 242 p.

36. Dalton R.J. Party identification and its implications. Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Ed. by W.R. Thompson. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.72

37. Dubrow J.K., Slomczynski K.M., Dubrow-Tomescu I. Effects of democracy and inequality on soft political protest in Europe: exploring the European social survey data. International journal of sociology. 2008. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 36–51. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659380302

38. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS3 — integrated file, edition 3.7 (Latvia and Romania not included) [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess3e03_7

39. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS4 — integrated file, edition 4.6 (Austria and Lithuania not included) [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023a. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess4e04_6

40. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS5 — integrated file, edition 3.5 (Austria not included) [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023b. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess5e03_5

41. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS6 — integrated file, edition 2.6 [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023c. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess6e02_6

42. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS7 — integrated file, edition 2.3 [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023d. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess7e02_3

43. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS8 — integrated file, edition 2.3 [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023e. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess8e02_3

44. European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC). ESS9 — integrated file, edition 3.2 [Data set]. Sikt — Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, 2023f. https://doi.org/10.21338/ess9e03_2

45. Farah B.G., Barnes S.H., Heunks F. Political dissatisfaction. Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Ed by S.H. Barnes, M. Kaase et al. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979. P. 409–447.

46. Gallego A. Unequal political participation in Europe. International journal of sociology. 2007. Vol. 37. No. 4. P. 10–25. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659370401

47. Inglehart R. Political action: the impact of values, cognitive level, and social background. Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Ed. by S.H. Barnes, M. Kaase et al. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979. P. 343–380.

48. McAllister I. Partisanship and political participation. Research handbook on political partisanship. Ed. by H. Oscarsson, S. Holmberg. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. P. 266–280. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111997

49. McAllister I., White S. Conventional citizen participation. Democratization. Ed. by C.W. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, C. Welzel, Inglehart R.F. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. P. 197–211.

50. Milbrath L.W. Political participation. The handbook of political behavior. Ed. by S.L. Long. Boston, MA: Springer, 1981. P. 197–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3878-9_4

51. Milbrath L.W., Goel M.L. Political participation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1982. 236 p.

52. Schlozman K.L., Brady H.E. Political science and political participation. The Oxford handbook of political participation. Ed. by M. Giugni, M. Grasso. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. P. 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861126.001.0001

53. Schnaudt C. Political confidence and democracy in Europe: antecedents and consequences of citizens’ confidence in representative and regulative institutions and authorities. Cham: Springer, 2019. 324 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89432-4_2

54. Smets K., van Ham C. The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral studies. 2013. Vol. 32. No. 2. P. 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006

55. Smith M.L. The inequality of participation: re-examining the role of social stratification and post-communism on political participation in Europe. Sociologický časopis / czech sociological review. 2009. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 487–517. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2009.45.3.01

56. Stolle D., Hooghe M. Shifting inequalities: patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European societies. 2011. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2010.523476

57. Verba S., Nie N.H. Participation in America: political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row, 1972. 428 p.

58. Verba S., Schlozman K.L., Brady H.E. Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995. 664 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7
Article

Received: 12.06.2025

Accepted: 28.08.2025

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

ACM
[1]
Safronov, V.V. 2025. “Conventional” political participation in Russia: prevalence and social structuring. Vlast i Elity (Power and Elites). 12, 1 (Aug. 2025), 119-161. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2025.12.1.4.
Section
Democracy and Civil Participation